Advice & Dissent Submission Form
E Magazine
Advanced Search
Our Planet
Sign up for OurPlanet, our FREE weekly newsletter
Enter e-mail address:
Email:
Print ViewPrint View Without GraphicsMail to a Friend
THIS WEEK

Greens Unite in Rejecting Nukes as Climate Solution

December 21, 2007
Reporting by Roddy Scheer

A huge joint statement is uniting voices across the world against nuclear power.
© Getty Images
More than 500 organizations from the U.S. and abroad, including some of the world’s largest and most influential environmental organizations, have signed a joint statement explicitly rejecting “the construction of new nuclear reactors as a means of addressing the climate crisis.” Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth International, Sierra Club, Clean Water Action, and Rainforest Action Network and a few of the many environmental groups that have signed on, along with major peace groups like Code Pink, Peace Action, and Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, and hundreds of grassroots environmental, sustainable energy, religious, peace and other groups and businesses large and small from 46 states and 38 countries on six continents. 5900 individuals also have signed the statement, and more are signing every day.

Beyond rejecting nuclear power as the answer, the statement also embraces renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies as “faster, cheaper, safer and cleaner strategies for reducing greenhouse emissions.”

The release of the statement is timed to coincide with Congress considering billions of dollars of taxpayer-backed loan guarantees for new nuclear reactor construction, partly as a way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the generation of electricity. While some environmentalists have jumped on the nuclear power bandwagon, most have dug their heels in against it as unsafe and too expensive.

“We keep hearing from nuclear industry lobbyists that environmentalists are ‘re-examining’ nuclear power,” said Michael Mariotte, executive director of Nuclear Information and Resource Service (NIRS), the non-profit watchdog group that has been collecting the signatures. “That re-examination is long over, and it is clear that nuclear power is not helpful at addressing the climate crisis. Indeed, because of its high costs, long construction times, and its own considerable carbon footprint, its use would actually make matters much worse by diverting the resources necessary to take genuinely effective steps to end carbon emissions.”

Source: To sign the statement

Did you enjoy this article? Subscribe to E/The Environmental Magazine!
Editors, if you are interested in reprinting this article, please contact Featurewell / (212) 924-2283

For photocopy or other reuse requests please click this link:



FREE TRIAL ISSUE!


Please send me a FREE TRIAL ISSUE of E / The Environmental Magazine. I'm under NO OBLIGATION to subscribe. If E is all I hope it will be, I'll become a subscriber at $24.95 for one full year (6 big issues), a savings of 17% off of the bookstore price. If E fails to meet my expectations, I can write 'cancel' on the bill, return it to you and owe nothing. The FREE TRIAL ISSUE is mine to keep without further obligation. Free offer for U.S. residents only. Canadian and foreign subscribers please click here.

Risk-Free. Just fill out the form and click submit.
First Name:
Last Name:
Address:
Company:
City:
State:

Zip:Country:
Email:

Shopping Cart and eCommerce Software by Volusion eCommerce Solutions.










Environmental News Releases

Conservation/Recycling News Releases
Terms of UsePrivacy Policy

E MAGAZINE.COM
A service of E/The Environmental Magazine. Copyright 1995 - 2009. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright Notice